Hi all, This has been in my backlog for months now and I finally have time to devote to it. I’d love to hear thoughts. tdlr; Successor operands are overly restrictive, create lots of headaches, and should be removed. Generalizing Successor Operands The current modeling of branch successor operan…

Removing Successor Operands

ftynse March 2, 2020, 12:57pm 5

This makes total sense. Thanks, River!

Duplicate successors in LLVM dialect

Topic		Replies	Views
Duplicate successors in LLVM dialect MLIR	28	2032	March 6, 2020
Extending Control-Flow Interfaces MLIR	2	518	April 22, 2020
Problem to remove successors LLVM Dev List Archives	1	122	August 1, 2013
How to remove some operation? MLIR	8	748	February 16, 2023
Issue with LLVM::InvokeOp MLIR	5	1248	August 9, 2020