[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 is here

Hi,

I was wondering what is the rationale for 'not' utility and if it could be implemented using LIT builtin (like some shell operators). Or at least made independent of LLVM. It’s not really built along with regular tools (it has very limited use contrary to, say, FileCheck) and having it in path is undesirable due to the generic name. This makes testing llvm tools harder. Especially if they don't rely on LLVM directly.

I don't know why it's not a lit builtin, but I think discussing that
in a separate llvm-dev thread is better.

Thanks,
Hans

Great - I've re-run the full Zig test suite with LLVM assertions enabled
and verified that rc5 passes all tests.

Thanks, looking forward to the release!

Andrew