# An update on linalg on tensors

**URL:** <https://discourse.llvm.org/t/an-update-on-linalg-on-tensors/1878>\
**Category:** MLIR\
**Created:** [September 29, 2020, 11:27am UTC](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/an-update-on-linalg-on-tensors/1878 "2020-09-29T11:27:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nicolasvasilache](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex021/user_avatar/discourse.llvm.org/nicolasvasilache/32/131_2.png) [@nicolasvasilache](https://discourse.llvm.org/u/nicolasvasilache)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2020, 7:11pm UTC](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/an-update-on-linalg-on-tensors/1878/4 "2020-09-30T19:11:37Z")

</div>

> [@hanchung](#):
>
> Moving them out of IREE would be great. Most of them can be moved out easily, e.g., conv, dot, etc. I remember that the logic of lowering ops that have reduction loops is different. In IREE, we lower it to Linalg indexed\_generic op or pooling ops, but in mlir-hlo repo we lower them to parallel loops. I’m happy to work together on this if we want to put them to another place.

Also ping @pifon2a who I believe has already started hacking some of this towards the MHLO repo?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/an-update-on-linalg-on-tensors/1878)._