[ARM backend] SMLAL issue

Hi James,
Patch for this is almost ready, I am now considering some cases around SMLALBB.

I came across one the gcc test cases and was a bit puzzled and hoped you would clarify it.

/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_dsp } */

long long
foo (long long a, char *b, char *c)
  return a + *b * *c;

/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "umlal" } } */

For this test case, why is gcc toolchain expecting UMLAL instead of SMLAL, because the multiplication is being done on signed char values?

Jyoti Allur