c++-analyzer on llvm-clang svn r160917

Hi,

The results from running scan-build (r160917) on llvm-clang svn r160917 :

http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/clang-analyzer/llvm-clang/r160917/

Regards,

John Smith.

To anyone outside the analyzer group who's watching this: the giant jump in bugs reported comes from turning on inlining of C++ methods. The problem is that called methods are using more defensive programming than the callers actually need, and so our heuristics about whether to warn about something (say, a possible null pointer dereference) get very confused.

We definitely need to rework our heuristics here!
Jordan