I think that’s a great path forward. Maybe you can see how far you get and update everyone the first meeting in January? I suspect that after someone has tried and seen what works and what doesn’t that we’ll be able to have a more concrete discussion.
That sounds good to me.
+1 great path Mike!
@mikeurbach sorry if this is really obvious to everyone else here, but the idea is to turn something like a numpy or pytorch program into a description that represents actual hardware?
That is the idea. The devil is in the details of course, and there is plenty of work to be done to handle these sorts of programs in CIRCT.