Coverage Update on http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/

Project Infrastructure LLVM Dev List Archives
1

Hi,

Anyone knows who is involved with this page on llvm.org? Which bot is updating it? (it seems stalled right now)

Thanks,

Mehdi

2

Le 16/05/2016 à 19:19, Mehdi Amini a écrit :

Hi,

Anyone knows who is involved with this page on llvm.org? Which bot is updating it? (it seems stalled right now)

I am in charge of this. I had some recent issues with cmake but I think
I fixed them today.
Hopefully, it should be updated today or tomorrow (I just re-triggered a
new build)

Cheers,
Sylvestre

3

Thanks Sylvestre!
It hasn't updated yet, did the job fail?

Also, could this be made a build bot on http://lab.llvm.org:8011 to provide some visibility?

Best,

4

Le 17/05/2016 à 20:31, Mehdi Amini a écrit :

Le 16/05/2016 à 19:19, Mehdi Amini a écrit :

Hi,

Anyone knows who is involved with this page on llvm.org? Which bot is updating it? (it seems stalled right now)

I am in charge of this. I had some recent issues with cmake but I think
I fixed them today.
Hopefully, it should be updated today or tomorrow (I just re-triggered a
new build)

Thanks Sylvestre!
It hasn't updated yet, did the job fail?

Yes, the testsuite is failing on i386 (cannot find the libllvm file).
Don't know why...

Also, could this be made a build bot on http://lab.llvm.org:8011 to provide some visibility?

This is not managed by a build bot instance but jenkins.

Sylvestre

5

OK, but I don't imagine it would be hard to convert it to a buildbot job.. We may be able to host something on green dragon as well: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/

6

Green Dragon is Jenkins, maybe an easier route than Buildbots?

--renato

7

This is now fixed: http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/

Sorry for the delay,
Sylvestre

8

No pb! Thanks for doing it, I believe having continuous tracking of our coverage is valuable for the project!

9

I skimmed the results, and it seems that there was a problem with the update, the coverage is really too low in many places, especially compared to the previous run from last month. Can you double check?

Thanks,

Mehdi

10

OK, I see what is wrong, most of the llvm tests are failing because: Thanks, Sylvestre

11

That was indeed the issue. Disabling lld is giving normal results: S