CXXCtorInitializer different for templated and non templated code

Clang Frontend
#1

Hi,

I recently found out that for the following sample:

class Pair {

  int a,b;

public:

  Pair(int f,int s){

    a=f;

    b=s;

  }  

};



template <class T> class A : public Pair {

  A(int f, int s) : Pair(f,s){}

};



Clang produces a ParenListExpr as init expression for the Pair(f,s) call.



However if the class A has no template parameter i.e. just class A: public Pair{

Clang produces a CXXConstructExpr as init expression .



Why does it matter if there is a template argument for the CXXCtorInitializer ?



Thanks for your answers.

Cheers,

Lukas



PS: complete dumps of both samples:

non-templated:
#2

clang only builds a CXXConstructExpr when we know which constructor
will be called. That isn't possible if the base in question is
dependent, or if we don't know which base will be initialized. (In
this particular case, we can tell the exact type of the base which
will be initialized, but clang doesn't have code to reason about which
cases are safe.)

-Eli

#3

Great thanks for the fast answer.

Cheers,
Lukas