Expose name mangling via libclang?


Would there be an objection to exposing Clang’s mangling APIs via libclang? I found https://gist.github.com/tritao/2766291 which doesn’t seem to have ever landed upstream.


I think it would make sense to expose an interface to get a symbol from a cursor. We should suggest using USRs when they’re more appropriate in the documentation, though.

Agree. I thought it was already, TBH.