Here’s another go at __has_include and __has_include_next for your review.
-John
hasinclude1.patch (13.2 KB)
Here’s another go at __has_include and __has_include_next for your review.
-John
hasinclude1.patch (13.2 KB)
In the documentation, please add an explicit “to test for this feature, use #if defined(__has_include)” at the bottom of the section.
Minor style suggestion, instead of :
How about:
Otherwise, looks great! Please apply, thanks John!
-Chris