IMPORTANT: LLVM Bugzilla migration

Project Infrastructure LLVM Dev List Archives
1

Hi,

Is it possible to preserve the [sub]component as labels?
For eg., this bug 51146 – Support common symbols in LTO was
previously under lld-MachO.
Now it is grouped into one lld label :
https://github.com/llvm/test8/issues/51146

Thanks!

Vy

2

Ah, yeah, this is pretty important for us; we want to be able to filter by and subscribe to LLD Mach-O bugs specifically.

3

Ah, yeah, this is pretty important for us; we want to be able to filter by and subscribe to LLD Mach-O bugs specifically.

From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces@lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Vy Nguyen via llvm-dev <llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org>
Reply-To: Vy Nguyen <vyng@google.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 at 8:23 AM
To: "llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" <llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] IMPORTANT: LLVM Bugzilla migration

Hi,

Is it possible to preserve the [sub]component as labels?

For eg., this bug 51146 – Support common symbols in LTO was previously under lld-MachO.

Now it is grouped into one lld label : https://github.com/llvm/test8/issues/51146

Yes. For lld's 4 ports, it would be nice to split the labels, e.g.:

lld-COFF: https://github.com/llvm/test8/issues/28566
lld-ELF: https://github.com/llvm/test8/issues/48023
lld-MachO: https://github.com/llvm/test8/issues/51146
lld-wasm: https://github.com/llvm/test8/issues/45457

4

>
> Ah, yeah, this is pretty important for us; we want to be able to filter by and subscribe to LLD Mach-O bugs specifically.
>
>
>
> From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces@lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Vy Nguyen via llvm-dev <llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org>
> Reply-To: Vy Nguyen <vyng@google.com>
> Date: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 at 8:23 AM
> To: "llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" <llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org>
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] IMPORTANT: LLVM Bugzilla migration
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Is it possible to preserve the [sub]component as labels?
>
> For eg., this bug 51146 – Support common symbols in LTO was previously under lld-MachO.
>
> Now it is grouped into one lld label : https://github.com/llvm/test8/issues/51146
Yes. For lld's 4 ports, it would be nice to split the labels, e.g.:

After reading [llvm-dev] IMPORTANT: LLVM Bugzilla migration
, make a correction to the label scheme (use : instead of -)

lld:COFF
lld:ELF
lld:MachO
lld:wasm

5

Sure!