Hello, Gary
I'm getting a weird error if I run llc on the attached module.
Did I do something wrong (llc says the module is broken, also
attached) or is this a bug?
This is clear indication, that module was constructed improperly: there
is some possible path in CFG, where result of instruction can be used
before actual definition.
Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> I'm getting a weird error if I run llc on the attached module.
> Did I do something wrong (llc says the module is broken, also
> attached) or is this a bug?
This is clear indication, that module was constructed improperly:
there is some possible path in CFG, where result of instruction
can be used before actual definition.
Ah, I found it, it's totally my error. Thanks!
Cheers,
Gary