[iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 0/5] Minor improvements to the bpf backend

Hi Richard,

sounds like em number is now set to 247 and paper work filed?
When should I expect v2 of these patches?
3.9 release branch will be forked mid july.
would be great to get these changes in soon.

Thanks

Hi,

Using EM_NONE for the bpf backend e_machine value is less than optimal.
With a unique value we can interact with other tools, e.g. objdump for
disassembly.

As a bonus, I noticed a few missing patterns that are useful to implement.

Hi Richard,

sounds like em number is now set to 247 and paper work filed?

Yes.

When should I expect v2 of these patches?
3.9 release branch will be forked mid july.
would be great to get these changes in soon.

I'm working on that today.

r~