Is LowerInvoke's "-enable-correct-eh-support" option unused?

On that topic, should LowerInvoke's "-enable-correct-eh-support" option be
removed, since it appears to be unused? If so, I can prepare a patch.

This option lowers exception handling to setjmp/longjmp, but it uses a
variable called "llvm.sjljeh.jblist" for the list of saved setjmp frames.
I've not found any code that looks at that list to implement throwing an
exception. It looks like this was replaced by SjLjEHPrepare a long time
ago.

Cheers,
Mark

IIRC, the LowerInvoke pass was for the C backend and is at least mostly vestigial now. The SjLj style EH it did was very different from what the SjLjEHPrepare pass implements.
-Jim

Right. So it can be safely removed.