JFYI: svn 1.0.1 released

Hi all,

Here:
  http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2003-October/000523.html
Chris wrote:

We certainly acknowledge that CVS has severe
deficiencies, but in the near future we'll probably stay with it.
Perhaps after SVN 1.0 comes out... :slight_smile:

so, now it is:
  http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectNewsList

:wink:

P.S. any March LLVM news?

best regards

Hi all,

Here:
  http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2003-October/000523.html
Chris wrote:

> We certainly acknowledge that CVS has severe
> deficiencies, but in the near future we'll probably stay with it.
> Perhaps after SVN 1.0 comes out... :slight_smile:

so, now it is:
  http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectNewsList

Yup, I saw that. :slight_smile: We don't really have any immediate plans to switch
over to svn in the near future (too many other interesting things to work
on), though if someone wanted to set up a CVS->svn gateway that might be
an interesting start :slight_smile:

P.S. any March LLVM news?

Yes, definitely. Stay tuned, we'll let you know by the end of the week :slight_smile:

-Chris

Before we attempt a switch we may want to look at other alternatives
like arch or even bitkeeper. I found a site that has a lot of
information on different version control systems:
http://better-scm.berlios.de/

Here are some comparisons as well:

http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
http://wiki.gnuarch.org/moin.cgi/SubVersionAndCvsComparison