Hi all,
Here:
http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2003-October/000523.html
Chris wrote:
We certainly acknowledge that CVS has severe
deficiencies, but in the near future we'll probably stay with it.
Perhaps after SVN 1.0 comes out...
so, now it is:
http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectNewsList
P.S. any March LLVM news?
best regards
Hi all,
Here:
http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2003-October/000523.html
Chris wrote:> We certainly acknowledge that CVS has severe
> deficiencies, but in the near future we'll probably stay with it.
> Perhaps after SVN 1.0 comes out...so, now it is:
http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectNewsList
Yup, I saw that. 
We don't really have any immediate plans to switch
over to svn in the near future (too many other interesting things to work
on), though if someone wanted to set up a CVS->svn gateway that might be
an interesting start
P.S. any March LLVM news?
Yes, definitely. Stay tuned, we'll let you know by the end of the week
-Chris
Before we attempt a switch we may want to look at other alternatives
like arch or even bitkeeper. I found a site that has a lot of
information on different version control systems:
Here are some comparisons as well: