I've run into strange behavior around std::is_abstract from libc++.
It off course returns true for classes with pure virtual functions, but
returns false for class templates with pure virtual functions. I'm
attaching a test code for the behavior. I tested on Debian with package
libc++-dev 3.9.1-2 and both clang-3.8 3.8.1-17 and clang-3.9.1-4.
I have little knowledge about C++ standards, but is this behavior
compliant with the standards?
FWIW, std::is_abstract from libstdc++ returns true for both cases.
test_is_abstract.cc (507 Bytes)