LLVMdev Digest, Vol 57, Issue 51

Hi Evan,

Is it possible to implement it without using MachineModuleInfo?

but llvm-2.5 didn't , if implement it without using MachineModuleInfo, so
I should create another ADT, but that is mostly same to MachineModuleInfo,
that's repeat work! or less cost for me !

It's being removed.

if so, what's the replacement of the MachineModuleInfo ?

zhangzw

Hi Evan,

Is it possible to implement it without using MachineModuleInfo?

but llvm-2.5 didn't , if implement it without using MachineModuleInfo, so
I should create another ADT, but that is mostly same to MachineModuleInfo,
that's repeat work! or less cost for me !

That's fine if you want to use MMI for now. But it's likely to be removed in the future. If you contribute your code back to mainline. We'll make sure it won't get broken.

It's being removed.

if so, what's the replacement of the MachineModuleInfo ?

There isn't. It's just unnecessary.

Evan