It appears you filed PR 8538 about this, but didn’t cc yourself. You should look at it; I don’t think this is a clang problem.
It appears you filed PR 8538 about this, but didn’t cc yourself. You should look at it; I don’t think this is a clang problem.
Thanks, I receive the comments and I've seen it.
I tested it and you are right, it works with std=gnu89. I have checked it
before with std=c89 and it didn't work, but it looks like gnu89 is the
solution.
Alexandra
Dale Johannesen wrote: