The attached patch fixes a bootstrap failure introduced by the use of
llvm_streams.
Best Regards,
Rafael
llvm-gcc.patch (1.19 KB)
The attached patch fixes a bootstrap failure introduced by the use of
llvm_streams.
Best Regards,
Rafael
llvm-gcc.patch (1.19 KB)
The llvm_ostreams, which you take the address of go out of scope very
quickly, and are only stored by address in the bytecode writer, thus
the writers have a pointer to a stack allocated object they are to
write to. This crashes.
Andrew
The llvm_ostreams, which you take the address of go out of scope very
quickly, and are only stored by address in the bytecode writer, thus
the writers have a pointer to a stack allocated object they are to
write to. This crashes.
The attached version leaks
It is a work around. If I understand correctly, the ostream wrapper is
also a temporary solution, so this might be acceptable.
Andrew
Thanks,
Rafael
llvm-gcc.patch (1.23 KB)
This patch crashes the built compiler.
Hmm, that looks like what I did in my tree
Andrew
Hey guys,
Notice that the llvm_ostream doesn't delete the ostream that you pass
into it. If you want to make sure that it's deleted, I think you'll
want to pass in "true" to the WriteBytecodePass so that it'll delete
the llvm_ostream. This won't affect the AsmOutFile, which gets deleted
at the end of the function...
-bw
Actually, take a look at the current TOT for llvm-gcc4. Jim & I put a
patch in there yesterday that should make things work with
llvm_ostreams.
-bw