[PITCH#2] Improvements to LLVM Decision Making

Hi all,

Thank you for everyone that participated in the first round of the discussion. I’ve incorporated feedback into the draft of the proposal, and I’d appreciate it if you could take another look and share your thoughts.

One piece of feedback is that GitHub gists aren’t great for detailed feedback and iteration, so I moved the proposal to a google doc here. There is also a draft of the proposal template here. I consider the proposal process to be the first trial run for the proposal process itself :-). Once the drafts converge, we’ll get things checked in and aligned to the process.

That said, I’d really like feedback ahead of the “official” discussion to help shape this. Please either comment on the google docs or in this thread. Thanks!

-Chris

Hi Chris,

LGTM. Lets run a few proposals and see how it goes.

P.S.: Thank you for not forcing me to give you a hard time :wink:

Best,
Christian

Hi Chris,

LGTM. Lets run a few proposals and see how it goes.

Thanks! A few comments are still trickling in on the docs, my hope is to keep improving them, then cut it off at some point, check it into the tree somewhere and send a pointer to this list.

P.S.: Thank you for not forcing me to give you a hard time :wink:

Haha :slight_smile:

-Chris

Thank you for working on this, Chris! This proposal solves a very important issue. It looks good to me and I would support using this process in LLVM and subprojects.

Dmitri