(Using OSX 10.10.1, XCode 6.1.1 6A2008a, lldb-320.4.156, Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.56) (based on LLVM 3.5svn) )
I have just started using LLDB and its Python scripting interface.
I may have stumbled upon a deep bug related to null pointer treatment.
http://lldb.llvm.org/scripting.html I tried to follow this scripting tutorial.
http://pastebin.com/S0RhVG3s This is the output of my interaction with the lldb and the python script. (I haven’t modified any part of the example code there)
It seems like
if left_child_ptr.GetValue() == None: expression (and other similar expressions) doesn’t evaluate to true for null pointers
I was able to cook up a python check for null pointer:
ptr_string = str(ptr.GetValue())
if re.search(’[1-9a-fA-F]’, ptr_string):
I discussed this on the irc channel and zturner thought it looked like a bug and that I should post it here.
Hope this helps.
Please let me know if there is a standard way to do null pointer check through the python API. Especially a check for nullptr shared_ptrs.
I may be clearly misunderstanding what you are trying to say here, but my expectation is that given
T *ptr = nullptr;
the way to check if “ptr” is a nullptr would be
sbvalueForPtr.GetValueAsUnsigned() == 0
given that sbvalueForPtr.GetType().IsPointerType() is true
As for the special case of a shared_ptr<>, that is a class that has an instance variable of pointer type. To check for NULL-ness, you’re gonna have to retrieve the child. That requires you to have some knowledge of the internals of your standard C++ library.
An alternative would be (and I am not sure if that is plugged in at the moment - if not feel free to ask for it, or provide a patch to that effect) to use the recently added ability for synthetic children to provide a numeric value. One could imagine wiring things up so that the shared_ptr<>'s value is the underlying pointer value. Then no child fetching would be required.
The issue is that the example on the website is broken because it checks GetValue() == None. So either the example is wrong or the implementation is wrong. Checking GetValue() against None is the intuitive thing one would do though, so it seems desirable to make that work
The issue is that the example on the website is broken because it checks GetValue() == None. So either the example is wrong
I would posit that the example is wrong - I don’t think anyone updated it in the longest time, definitely not me
or the implementation is wrong. Checking GetValue() against None is the intuitive thing one would do though, so it seems desirable to make that work
In our API, generally, an answer of None means “could not compute this” - for instance, your SBValue refers to a variable that is out of scope, or is outright invalid
Conflating the case of “I could compute this, the answer is 0” with “I could not compute this” feels wrong - also, imagining this from the perspective of, say, an IDE, it makes for more convoluted code:
value = obj.GetValue()
if value == None:
if value.IsValid(): value = “NULL” #argh - None now means two things!!!
I would also recommend against GetValue() for numeric comparisons - I think even right now, that API returns “NULL” the string for null pointers and “nil” for the ObjC version thereof - and if we could reliably tell C++ >= 11, I would have no objection to making it return “nullptr” when applicable
If you need a numeric value to compare - GetValueAsSigned/Unsigned() are the APIs to go to - and even those should NOT return None to mean NULL, but the correct bit pattern to mean NULL on the underlying system (which we are assuming to be 0
Thank you Enrico and Zachary,
I’ve updated my nullpointer checking code as follows.
if ptr.GetType().IsPointerType() and ptr.GetValueAsUnsigned() == 0:
That looks much more stable now.
I hope someone reads this thread and corrects the example to fix the null pointer checks.