r176987 - Attempt to fix test.

Hmmm... did i mess up here?

really we just need to check for the presence of "mips16" or "nomips16".

can we just prefix those strings with a wildcard?

I was copying the style of some other tests.

Reed

Author: void
Date: Wed Mar 13 17:29:26 2013
New Revision: 176987

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=176987&view=rev
Log:
Attempt to fix test.

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/mips16-attr.c

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/mips16-attr.c
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/mips16-attr.c?rev=176987&r1=176986&r2=176987&view=diff

--- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/mips16-attr.c (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/mips16-attr.c Wed Mar 13 17:29:26 2013
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ void __attribute__((nomips16)) nofoo (vo

// CHECK: define void @nofoo() [[NOMIPS16:#[0-9]+]]

-// CHECK: attributes [[MIPS16]] = { nounwind "fp-contract-model"="standard" "mips16" {{.*}} }
+// CHECK: attributes [[MIPS16]] = { nounwind "mips16" {{.*}} }

-// CHECK: attributes [[NOMIPS16]] = { nounwind "fp-contract-model"="standard" "nomips16" {{.*}} }
+// CHECK: attributes [[NOMIPS16]] = { nounwind "nomips16" {{.*}} }

Hmmm... did i mess up here?

Nope. It was me.

-bw