[RFC] jump threading on std::pair<int, bool>

Hi,

While comparing the code by LLVM and GCC for some major libraries, I found that LLVM fails to apply jump threading with a method whose return type is std::pair<int, bool> (actually, any pair of 32-bit values like std::pair<bool, int> and std::pair<int, int>).
For example, jump threading does not work for the if statement in func.

std::pair<int, bool> callee(int v) {
int a = dummy(v);
if (a) return std::make_pair(dummy(v), true);
else return std::make_pair(v, v < 0);
}

int func(int v) {
std::pair<int, bool> rc = callee(v);
if (rc.second) {
// do something
}

SROA executed before the method inlining replaces std::pair by i64 without splitting in both callee and func since at this point no access to the individual fields is seen to SROA.
After inlining, jump threading fails to identify that the incoming value is a constant due to additional instructions (like or, and, trunc).

I would appreciate it if I could have any suggestions on how we can optimization such cases.
I am planning to enhance InstCombine pass to eliminate these additional instructions before jump threading rather than enhancing SROA or jump threading.

Here is LLVM IR generated for above C code.

define signext i32 @_Z4funci(i32 signext %v) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
entry:
%call.i = tail call signext i32 @_Z5dummyi(i32 signext %v)
%tobool.i = icmp eq i32 %call.i, 0
br i1 %tobool.i, label %if.else.i, label %if.then.i

if.then.i: ; preds = %entry
%call1.i = tail call signext i32 @_Z5dummyi(i32 signext %v)
%retval.sroa.0.0.insert.ext.i.i = zext i32 %call1.i to i64
br label %_ZL6calleei.exit

if.else.i: ; preds = %entry
%.lobit.i = lshr i32 %v, 31
%0 = zext i32 %.lobit.i to i64
%retval.sroa.2.0.insert.shift.i8.i = shl nuw nsw i64 %0, 32
%retval.sroa.0.0.insert.ext.i9.i = zext i32 %v to i64
br label %_ZL6calleei.exit

_ZL6calleei.exit: ; preds = %if.then.i, %if.else.i
%.sink = phi i64 [ 4294967296, %if.then.i ], [ %retval.sroa.0.0.insert.ext.i9.i, %if.else.i ]
%retval.sroa.0.0.insert.ext.i.i.sink = phi i64 [ %retval.sroa.0.0.insert.ext.i.i, %if.then.i ], [ %retval.sroa.2.0.insert.shift.i8.i, %if.else.i ]
%retval.sroa.0.0.insert.insert.i.i = or i64 %retval.sroa.0.0.insert.ext.i.i.sink, %.sink
%rc.sroa.0.0.extract.trunc = trunc i64 %retval.sroa.0.0.insert.insert.i.i to i32
%1 = and i64 %retval.sroa.0.0.insert.insert.i.i, 4294967296
%tobool = icmp eq i64 %1, 0
br i1 %tobool, label %if.end, label %if.then ; <<- not jump threaded

InstCombiner::SliceUpIllegalIntegerPHI already sort of does what you want... but it's currently disabled for legal integer types. Not sure what the performance implications would be if we run that more aggressively.

-Eli