That’s a decision we’d have to make… but probably.
So one issue I see with this specifically is that Flang is not even considered one of LLVM_ALL_PROJECTS yet:
From llvm/CMakeLists.txt:
set(LLVM_ALL_PROJECTS "bolt;clang;clang-tools-extra;compiler-rt;cross-project-tests;libc;libclc;lld;lldb;mlir;openmp;polly;pstl")
# The flang project is not yet part of "all" projects (see C++ requirements)
set(LLVM_EXTRA_PROJECTS "flang")
# List of all known projects in the mono repo
set(LLVM_KNOWN_PROJECTS "${LLVM_ALL_PROJECTS};${LLVM_EXTRA_PROJECTS}")
set(LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS "" CACHE STRING
"Semicolon-separated list of projects to build (${LLVM_KNOWN_PROJECTS}), or \"all\".")
# Make sure expansion happens first to not handle "all" in rest of the checks.
if( LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS STREQUAL "all" )
set( LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS ${LLVM_ALL_PROJECTS})
endif()
So enabling flang-rt as something thats built when building “all” runtimes seems like overstepping, at least until flang is treated as part of “all” projects