Version Control


The oversight group has been kicking around the idea of getting a better
version control system than CVS. The problem is, we're not quite sure
what "better" means. So, we thought we'd ask your opinions.

There are three options, unless someone strongly advocates another

1. Stay with CVS
2. Use Subversion
3. Use arch

Some of the things we're trying to accomplish are:

      * Atomic commit (all changed files in a change set get committed
        or none of them do). [Subversion]
      * Apache httpd based authentication/authorization [Subversion with

Please disregard this last message I sent out. It got sent half-baked.
I'll finish it up and send it again.