Have there been any developments in the codegen/scheduling
infrastructure that would invalidate the advice given in this thread
from September 2005?
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2005-September/004798.html
-Ken
Have there been any developments in the codegen/scheduling
infrastructure that would invalidate the advice given in this thread
from September 2005?
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2005-September/004798.html
-Ken
Have there been any developments in the codegen/scheduling
infrastructure that would invalidate the advice given in this thread
from September 2005?http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2005-September/004798.html
Not really. You will still have to add a functional unit assignment and packing pass after pre-allocation scheduling.
Evan