I do not consider PR1546 closed just yet.
What I mentioned in the PR was only two of
ca. 140 Solaris failures.
Most of them complain that llc cannot choose between C and
MSIL output formats.
The below prototypical patch corrects this type of failure.
Is this the right way of handling it?
Why does llc only fail on Solaris and not on Darwin?
After I understood this problem I am happy to commit these 100+ files.
Cheers,
Gabor
Index: /home/ggreif/llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/2005-07-12-memcpy-i64-length.ll
I do not consider PR1546 closed just yet.
What I mentioned in the PR was only two of
ca. 140 Solaris failures.
Most of them complain that llc cannot choose between C and
MSIL output formats.
The below prototypical patch corrects this type of failure.
Is this the right way of handling it?
Why does llc only fail on Solaris and not on Darwin?
After I understood this problem I am happy to commit these 100+ files.
I just committed a patch to the sparc backend. Please see if that helps.
-Chris
Cheers,
Gabor
Index: /home/ggreif/llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/2005-07-12-memcpy-i64-length.ll
--- /home/ggreif/llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/2005-07-12-memcpy-i64-length.ll (revision 38488)
+++ /home/ggreif/llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/2005-07-12-memcpy-i64-length.ll (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | llc
+; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | llc -march=c
; Test that llvm.memcpy works with a i64 length operand on all targets.
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-Chris
Hi Chris!
> After I understood this problem I am happy to commit these 100+ files.
I just committed a patch to the sparc backend. Please see if that helps.
-Chris
It *does* help!
These:
M ../llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/2006-08-15-SelectionCrash.ll
M ../llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/or-addressing-mode.ll
M ../llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/2006-01-20-ShiftPartsCrash.ll
I'll checkin soon, they should be analogous to your change.
Then my problem list will have shrunk to:
# of expected passes 1807
# of unexpected failures 15
# of expected failures 4
...which is pretty good, already.
Cheers,
Gabor