Should we address that by adding a helper that waits for a particular breakpoint to be resolved?
- If we set the breakpoints after the launch sequence, we could do both at the same time and have the helper not just wait for the breakpoint request to succeed, but also for the corresponding breakpoint to resolve.
- If we set the breakpoints during the launch sequence, we could use your suggestion from the PR and pass them to the launch/attach helper, which could wait for them to resolve.