I want to thank you for all of the great work on Clang/LLVM.
But, I need to complain about your documentation.
I am getting the doc from here, for example.
https://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1Expr.html
If that is not the latest and greatest, please let me know.
1 - Very few of the functions have a description of any kind.
I know this is a lot of work, but how long has Clang been around?
2 - If the argument list to a function is too long,
and you are zoomed in too far (for readability) it drives the
right most columns off the right hand edge of the page.
For example:
https://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1BinaryOperator-members.html
Recommendation: Set some upper limit and add new-lines after commas
in the argument list. Or use a table.
3 - The return-type for functions is not part of the function list.
For a beginner, that is just as valuable as the name, argument list and description.
I assume Doxygen could be ordered to include the return type.
I compare your documentation with that for the Qt class library.
Their doc is very good. Here is the Qt string class, for example:
https://doc.qt.io/qt-5.9/qstring.html
Qt includes the return type, prominently.
Qt wraps long argument lists. (I think they use a table so they get that for free.)
Qt documents every function.
Yes, Qt is a commercial product, but it offers the (L)GPL and is contributed
to greatly by the outside world.
Thanks.
Bill