Context: It’s been about a year since we moved from pybind11 to nanobind for the Python bindings. We’re now getting ready to fully remove the last bits that support pybind11 . If you for some reason would like us to wait, drop a comment here and we can discuss workarounds/mitigations/etc. (I’ll give…

What is it being replaced with ? From: Maksim Levental via LLVM Discussion Forums notifications@llvm.discoursemail.com Date: Monday, October 6, 2025 at 10:34 AM To: Muthu Annamalai mannamalai@cornami.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] [LLVM] [MLIR] PSA: removing pybind11 support [makslevental] maksle…

[image] makslevental: pybind11 to nanobind It was mentioned in the original message that it was replaced with nanobind ( https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117922 ).

Thanks From: Aiden Grossman via LLVM Discussion Forums notifications@llvm.discoursemail.com Date: Monday, October 6, 2025 at 1:26 PM To: Muthu Annamalai mannamalai@cornami.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] [LLVM] [MLIR] PSA: removing pybind11 support [boomanaiden154-1] boomanaiden154-1 October 6 …

PSA: removing pybind11 support

MLIR

makslevental October 6, 2025, 5:18pm 2

Merged. Reach out if you have any trouble.

Topic		Replies	Views
PSA: remove pybind11 support MLIR	3	240	December 19, 2025
Nanobind for MLIR python bindings MLIR	13	1120	December 19, 2024
PSA: MLIR Python bindings now require pybind11>=2.8.0 Deprecation & Important Refactoring	0	291	January 19, 2022
PSA: Python binding dependencies changing MLIR	7	514	December 11, 2024
Is anyone using still using the python bindings? LLVM Dev List Archives	3	379	August 28, 2017

PSA: removing pybind11 support

Related topics