Hi Richard, Marco,
I noticed that you two are the remaining bot owners using the
`getClangBuildFactory` from `ClangBuilder`. All the other bots using
that builder have moved to the new `getClangCMakeBuildFactory`,
including Windows ones.
Given that they do similar functionalities, I'd like to encourage you
to move to the new factory, so that we can simplify the builder's
code.
Thanks!
--renato
PS: The builders are:
Richard:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules-2
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules
Marco:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-bpf-build
Renato,
thanks for the heads-up.
For clang-bpf-build the change should be trivial since we don't use a
fancy configuration.
I have attached the patch, please apply if appropriate.
Thanks.
Regards,
Marco Leogrande
inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions.
0001-zorg-bpf-Convert-builder-to-use-getClangCMakeBuildFa.patch (1.42 KB)
I believe it should just work. Galina, can you give it a try?
The build should "just work". 
thanks!
--renato
I applied it and reconfigured the master.
Thanks for the heads-up!
Thanks
Galina
Thanks Galina!
Marco, the build is complaining about Ninja:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-bpf-build/builds/414/steps/cmake%20stage%201/logs/stdio
CMake was unable to find a build program corresponding to "Ninja"
Now I remember we used ninja by default because it's easier on Windows
(than make).
Can you install ninja on that machine?
$ sudo apt-get install ninja-build
should be enough. Sorry for that!
--renato
I have installed ninja and retriggered that build.
I will monitor the results to confirm it succeeds.
Regards,
Marco Leogrande
inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions.