dragonegg support for latest versions of llvm

Project Infrastructure LLVM Dev List Archives
1

Hello All,

I am in need of dragonegg support for the latest version of llvm.

I tried to make dragonegg with the latest versions but it fails. It is able to be maked with the llvm version 3.3 only with GCC 4.6. I am trying this on my ubuntu system. I tried to make dragonegg with various combinations of llvm and GCC versions but the only combination which seems to be working is LLVM-3.3, GCC-4.6 and dragonegg-3.3.

Is it a known issue? Could you please suggest anything so that I could be able to make dragonegg with latest versions of GCC and LLVM.

Many thanks.

2

I tried to make dragonegg with the latest versions but it fails. It is
able to be maked with the llvm version 3.3 only with GCC 4.6. I am trying
this on my ubuntu system. I tried to make dragonegg with various
combinations of llvm and GCC versions but the only combination which seems
to be working is LLVM-3.3, GCC-4.6 and dragonegg-3.3.

Is it a known issue? Could you please suggest anything so that I could be
able to make dragonegg with latest versions of GCC and LLVM.

​I think that's what you can get currently. AFAIK, dragonegg is not an
active project. Trying to use dragonegg with latest versions of GCC and
LLVM is too hard
, IMO. The best chance is sticking to GCC-4.6, then upgrading the dragonegg
with newer LLVM release (one at a time).

Regards,
chenwj

3

Hello,

Thank you for your reply.

I don’t get the upgrading the dragonegg with newer versions of LLVM. Do you mean that I should modify the dragonegg code to make it compatible with the newer versions? wouldn’t it be something like making dragonegg project active by myself?, Or do you mean something else. Please let me know.

Thanks a lot.

With best Regards:
Abhinav Prakash

4

I don't get the upgrading the dragonegg with newer versions of LLVM. Do
you mean that I should modify the dragonegg code to make it compatible with
the newer versions? wouldn't it be something like making dragonegg project
active by myself?, Or do you mean something else. Please let me know.

​Well, the source is out there. You can do it by yourself as I don't know
anyone actively maintain the project. =]
​